Great Analysis of the Paid-For E-mail Issue

by Teresa Valdez Klein on February 7, 2006

Silicon.com’s Spam Report offers some excellent analysis of paid-for e-mail and what it means.

My personal opinion is that there are too many different variables for this paid-for feature to become a success. After all, some people use the spam filtering software on their mail clients to sort out junk, and paid-for status isn’t going to change that. Also, like everything else, spammers will find a way to take advantage of this service despite all the protocols put in place to prevent them from doing so.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netscape
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

1

Peter Bowyer 02.07.06 at 2:29 pm

I think you can rely on AOL knowing how to let paid-for email through, and only paid-for email. And since the vast majority of AOL members use AOL’s customised client software, it’s easy for them to highlight ‘certified’ email in a way that stands out for the reader, and not get it caught in spam filters.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <p> <strike> <strong>