Chinese Bloggers Want to Forbid Starbucks in Forbidden City

by Teresa Valdez Klein on January 19, 2007

I was interested to read in today’s Wall Street Journal about the Chinese blogosphere’s outcry over the presence of a Starbucks inside the imperial Forbidden City.

I remember that my impression of the Forbidden City as a mysterious and special place was diminished somewhat when I found out from a friend that there was a Starbucks there. It actually made me less interested in visiting the City, simply because it seemed much less authentic.

Apparently, I’m not in the minority. When Chinese news anchor cum blogger Rui Chenggang (in Chinese) wrote about his discomfort with the juxtaposition of this Western cultural icon with one of the most iconic pieces of China’s history, the post got more than half a million page views.

According to the Journal, Rui wrote, “it is really too inappropriate for the world’s impression of the Forbidden City. This isn’t globalization, this is the erosion of Chinese culture.”

Other bloggers have joined Rui’s call for the Starbucks to be removed, and the Forbidden City museum is paying attention. They are currently in the process of reassigning the shops inside the City as part of an overall facelift for the campus. Starbucks may or may not be a part of that plan.

Any company that does business in China has to be aware of the phenomena that underlie this outcry. First and foremost, China is grappling with serious issues of tradition and modernity. Chinese people as a whole are embracing progress, but they are working hard to hang on to its own unique identity as a nation. This nationalist sentiment can often be found in the blogosphere, where China’s 20 million bloggers are more or less free to talk about their reaction to foreign business investment in their country.

Paying attention to the blogosphere is a necessity even when a company and the culture it serves are from the same culture of origin. But it goes doubly true when a company decides to cross cultural lines into wired countries like China.

If I were Starbucks, I would bow out gracefully from the location and open another store just outside the city. Then I would find a culturally appropriate way to tip the company’s cap to China’s past and present. What do you guys think Starbucks should do?

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netscape
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Kathleen Gage 01.20.07 at 5:33 am

Good to know that the voice of the people can be heard. And that not every culture has to have the “western” influence. Nice information.

Kathleen Gage
The Street Smarts Speaker and Author

2 Tyler Allan 01.25.07 at 6:33 pm

As a citizen of Canada, I have seen how American businesses have entered a country and ruined its identity. Canadian stores like the Hudson’s Bay Company and Tim Horton’s are now American owned, ruining a bit of our culture. The Imperial City is half a century old and a great monument to Imperial China. However, the introduction of a Starbucks ruins its historical and cultural significance. Starbucks should be immediately removed form this location, it won’t harm them they have 220 other stores in China, and all other stores which are of a Western influence.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <p> <strike> <strong>

Sponsored links

advertise here