Today without warning, MySpace unilaterally turned off its users’ access to PhotoBucket, which is one of the most popular third-party services for photo sharing and display on the Web.
Photobucket users can upload their photos and share them. Or they can create complicated slideshows and embed them using HTML. The most popular place to embed these slideshows and photos used to be MySpace, until the social networking giant unilaterally turned off access to the software.
On it’s blog, the Photobucket team wrote:
We are not happy about this and we’re pretty sure you’re not happy either. We appreciate that you have invested hundreds of thousands of hours using the editing, remixing and management tools and features available only on Photobucket. In particular, you’ve all been really embracing videos at Photobucket — to the tune of 50,000 video uploads a day, which is great. Rest assured that your content is being kept safe in your Photubucket album even though it may disappear from your MySpace pages.
We believe that by limiting your ability to personalize your pages with content from any source, MySpace is contradicting the very belief of personal and social media. MySpace became successful because of the creativity of you, its users, and because it offered a forum for self-expression. By severely restricting this freedom, MySpace is showing that it considers you as a commodity which it can treat as it sees fit.
I recently blogged about how Facebook learned its lesson about drastic unilateral changes to its product. In short, they unilaterally launched a very controversial feature known as a “news feed” about six months ago. The feature made users’ activities on the site much more public and transparent, and the uproar was tremendous.
Let’s contrast that with today. This morning, Facebook launched a series of major changes to their user interface. But this time, they were smart enough to engage users in the decision making process months ahead of time. They started a group for users who wanted to share their two cents about the new interface. They posted screenshots and discussed the ramifications of potential actions. They changed course on a few features based heavily on user input. In short, they listened.
I would argue that MySpace’s ban on Photobucket is even worse that last year’s newsfeed fiasco at Facebook. Why? Because on top of unilaterally taking action that profoundly affects their users, they’ve taken away an essential feature rather than adding something new and cool. This really does send the message to MySpace users that the site thinks of them as commodities rather than people who are building a community online.
Michael Arrington of TechCrunch believes a conspiracy is afoot:
This is turning into a habit for MySpace, which usually claims bugs, security issues or terms of service violations were the cause of a shut down. In January MySpace mysteriously shut down all Flash widgets on the site for 2.5 hours. An Imeem blockade came next. Vidilife, Stickam and Revver have been permanently banned.
Today’s shutdown of Photobucket comes suspiciously close to news that Photobucket is up for sale (Fox, MySpace’s parent company, was notoriously rumored to be furious when YouTube sold to Google). It seems that just when a company starts to break out from the pack, MySpace finds a security breach and shuts them down. Even though MySpace has flat out denied it to us, it is our belief that these blockages are meant to send a clear message to widget companies - don’t forget that MySpace is in charge.
If this is true, it represents a mentality that simultaneously devalues the individual user and third-party innovation that enhances the end user’s experience. With this kind of an attitude, MySpace might indeed go over the proverbial hill in a hurry.
Via Techmeme.