The semantics of blogging: Mark Cuban agrees with me

If you live in Seattle, you ought to check out the Seattle PI’s big kahuna: The Big Blog.

Mónica Guzmán (who writes for The Big Blog) and I were having a discussion a couple weeks ago about whether or not what she does should really be called “blogging.”

There’s a whole list of things that she has to do that have nothing to do with the way that I post. What she does is absolutely, unequivocally, journalistically superior.

She checks her sources. I make up words. She clears posts with an editor. I am source, writer, and publisher. She writes about things that are verifiable. I operate on wild speculation.

Why in the world should what I do be given the same name as what she does?

No matter how many times we tell people that a blog is just the system you use to publish, the fact is that people have not separated the platform from the content in their minds.

It’d be nice if you could say “I’m a blogger,” and get the follow up question, “what kind?” — the way that if you said “I’m a writer,” people might ask, “for what? TV? Magazines? Newspapers?” — but you can’t. And ignoring that won’t fix it.

She does “blogging PLUS,” and I think that giving it a linguistic distinction is probably a good idea. Mark Cuban explains why pretty well in his post:

I’m sure the NY Times, like all major media outlets hopes that because it is branded a NY Times blog, that readers will have the perception and expectation that it will be of a higher quality than say, Blogmaverick.com.

That when readers actually read the blog, they will see that its of a higher quality than say, Blogmaverick.com. It may well be that some do. The marketing reality however is that there is a significant risk that they will not. That rather than assigning the brand equity of the NY Times to the blogs hosted, they will take the alternative path of assigning their perception of what a blog is to the NY Times, there by having a negative impact on the brand equity of the NY Times. That’s an enormous risk for any mainstream brand to take.

I don’t think it has to be “Real Time Reporting” (kinda lame sounding), but it shouldn’t just be straight “blogging.”

There are satsumas and there are oranges. I feel like right now we’re calling everything oranges.

OK, you can all tell me why I’m wrong now.